The Trichology Review
Established 2021 · Independent · Reader-supported · No industry fundingVol. 6 · No. 14 — July 2026
THE TRICHOLOGY REVIEW
Evidence status: current·Last updated 12 Jun 2026 · v2.3·Revision history
Ingredient Monograph · Delivery & Procedures

Microneedling

Not a drug, a delivery multiplier. Its best evidence is as an adjunct that helps other actives arrive.

BModerate evidence · strongest as an adjunct
By M. Vogel
Trichology Editor
The bottom line

Controlled micro-injury triggers a wound-healing response, releasing the body's own growth factors, and, crucially, transiently opens the skin barrier so topicals penetrate better. Several RCTs show microneedling plus minoxidil beats minoxidil alone. On its own the effect is smaller.

Grade Alerts

Grades for hair treatments change. Know when they do. Get an alert when a grade moves, plus each new review. About 2 emails a month. No products, no sponsors.

Type
Physical procedure
Typical protocol
1.0–1.5 mm, weekly
Best role
Delivery adjunct

Why this belongs in the delivery conversation

Microneedling is interesting precisely because it proves the point this publication keeps making: delivery is often the bottleneck. The same active does more when it can actually reach the papilla. That is also the logic behind lipid carriers like oleosomes, two different answers to the same barrier problem.

Done too aggressively it causes irritation and scarring risk; technique and depth matter. As an adjunct to an evidenced active, the risk-to-reward is favourable.

Selected sourcesFull citation index →
01Zhang H, et al. FGF signalling in dermal papilla cells and anagen induction. J Invest Dermatol 2019;139(4):812–821. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.032
02Katsuoka K, et al. FGF-7 (KGF) and hair-matrix keratinocyte proliferation. Br J Dermatol 2017;176(6):1487–1495. doi:10.1111/bjd.15234
03Olsen EA, et al. Topical minoxidil: a 40-year evidence synthesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021;84(3):632–644. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.041
04Messenger AG, Rundegren J. Minoxidil: mechanisms of action on hair growth. Br J Dermatol 2004;150(2):186–194.
Referenced by
VogueAllureHarper’s Bazaarbyrdiewell+goodCosmopolitanGlamourmarie clairerefinery29InStyleDermatology TimesPractical DermatologyCosmetics & ToiletriesVogueAllureHarper’s Bazaarbyrdiewell+goodCosmopolitanGlamourmarie clairerefinery29InStyleDermatology TimesPractical DermatologyCosmetics & Toiletries
142
Dermatology practices citing us
9,400
Digest subscribers
40
Countries reached
68,000
Monthly readers
Dermatologists’ Choice — 142 dermatologists cite The Trichology Review in practice, uncompensated.
THE TRICHOLOGY REVIEW
contact@thetrichologyreview.org
An independent, reader-supported publication. We accept no advertising from ingredient or product manufacturers.
Dermatologists’ Choice · 142 dermatologists cite us, uncompensated
Grade Alerts
Grades for hair treatments change. Know when they do. Get an alert when a grade moves, plus each new review. About 2 emails a month. No products, no sponsors.
© 2026 The Trichology Review · Editorial independence policy