The Trichology Review
Established 2021 · Independent · Reader-supported · No industry fundingVol. 6 · No. 14 — July 2026
THE TRICHOLOGY REVIEW
Evidence status: current·Last updated 12 Jun 2026 · v2.3·Revision history
The Evidence Library

Every intervention, graded

Each ingredient and procedure read against the human trial data and scored A–D under one published methodology. Search or filter by grade and category.

Interventions Showing {{ count }} · sorted by evidence
GradeInterventionBest outcomeEvidence
{{ rec.grade }} {{ rec.name }}
{{ rec.category }}
{{ rec.outcome }} {{ rec.evidence }}
No interventions match. Try a different grade or term.
This library is expanding toward all 214 reviews.
Referenced by
VogueAllureHarper’s Bazaarbyrdiewell+goodCosmopolitanGlamourmarie clairerefinery29InStyleDermatology TimesPractical DermatologyCosmetics & ToiletriesVogueAllureHarper’s Bazaarbyrdiewell+goodCosmopolitanGlamourmarie clairerefinery29InStyleDermatology TimesPractical DermatologyCosmetics & Toiletries
142
Dermatology practices citing us
9,400
Digest subscribers
40
Countries reached
68,000
Monthly readers
Dermatologists’ Choice — 142 dermatologists cite The Trichology Review in practice, uncompensated.
THE TRICHOLOGY REVIEW
contact@thetrichologyreview.org
An independent, reader-supported publication. We accept no advertising from ingredient or product manufacturers.
Dermatologists’ Choice · 142 dermatologists cite us, uncompensated
Grade Alerts
Grades for hair treatments change. Know when they do. Get an alert when a grade moves, plus each new review. About 2 emails a month. No products, no sponsors.
© 2026 The Trichology Review · Editorial independence policy