A grade is only as good as the evidence under it. Every claim in a review traces back to a named source, and every source is weighted by what kind of study it is. Here is how that works.
Not all citations are equal. A claim supported only by cell-culture work cannot earn the same grade as one backed by replicated human trials.
A grade of A requires multiple consistent results at level 1. A B typically rests on levels 1 to 3 with limits noted. Anything sitting only at levels 4 to 5 cannot exceed C. The full rubric lives in the methodology.
Each in-text marker gives author, year, and journal, and points to the primary paper rather than a press release or a secondary summary. Where a study is small, preliminary, or industry-funded, we say so in the same breath as the citation.
A sample of the primary literature behind the current reviews. The full list is cited in place on each page.
Where a paper has a DOI or a PubMed identifier, it is included so you can read the original yourself. Found a citation you think is misread or out of date? Tell the editors and we will re-check it.

